| Group |
1 |
7 |
13 |
19 |
25 |
30 |
Rank |
| STRENGTHS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Community Concern |
5 |
|
|
5 |
4 |
|
2.3 |
| College Community |
4 |
|
3 |
4 |
5 |
4 |
3.3 |
| Potential of the City |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
| Organizational Longevity |
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
| Informal Networking System |
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
| Volunteer Spirit |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
| Business Owners |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
| Cultural Organizations |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
| No. of Organizations |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
0.5 |
| Manageable Size |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0.3 |
| Strong Leaders – Grps & Orgs |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
0.8 |
| Location |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0.2 |
| WEAKNESSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| No Coord w/ Neighboring Towns |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
| Lack of Communication |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
| No Leadership |
|
5 |
|
5 |
4 |
|
2.3 |
| No Master Plan |
|
4 |
4 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
| Cooperation w/ Bus-Gov-Edu. |
|
3 |
|
|
5 |
5 |
2.2 |
| Lack of City-Council Coop |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
| Lack of Investigative Reporting |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
| No Answers From City |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
| Political Direction |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
| Parking Authority |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
0.7 |
| Lack of Political Trust |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
0.5 |
| Neglect |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0.3 |
| Lack of Job Opportunities |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
0.7 |
| Image |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0.2 |
| OPPORTUNITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Building Committees |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
| Intermunicipal Cooperation |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
| Build Comm. Capacity |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
| Downtown Tax Incentives |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
| Joint College/City T. F. |
1 |
|
3 |
4 |
|
|
1.3 |
| Residential Empowerment |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
| Unified Business Assoc. |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
| Master Plan - Ideas |
|
3 |
4 |
|
3 |
|
1.7 |
| Return Land to Private Entities |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
| Stronger Historical Society |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
0.8 |
| Workforce |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
0.7 |
| Proximity to Major Markets |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0.3 |
| Diversity |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0.3 |
| Greater City-Chamber Coop. |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
0.8 |
| Greater Use of Educ. Inst. |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
0.7 |
| Space |
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
0.8 |
| THREATS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Nepotism |
5 |
5 |
|
4 |
|
|
2.3 |
| Political Money |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
| Isolationism |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
| Lack of Communication |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
| Lack of Gov-Bus. Vision |
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
| Lack of Accountability |
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
| Hostile City-Bus. Relations |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
| Lack of Master Plan |
|
|
4 |
|
|
4 |
1.3 |
| Declining Population |
|
|
3 |
|
5 |
|
1.5 |
| No Use State/Fed. Funding |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
| Lack of Investigative Reporting |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
| Negative Media |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
0.8 |
| Increasing Crime |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0.2 |
| Lack of Growth Space |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0.3 |
| City Financial Obligations |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
0.5 |
| Nearby Econ. Competition |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
0.8 |
| Limited Jobs |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
0.7 |
